Make a Source List for a Local History Project
Create a practical source list that records archive, item title, date, and access details for every record consulted.
Capture identity when you find a source
Record source details as soon as you locate an item, before moving to the next search result. Note the archive or repository name, the item’s full title, creator if known, date, and a stable catalog identifier. For a book or directory, include edition, volume, and page; for a map, include sheet or series information; for a newspaper item, capture publication, issue date, headline, and page when available.
Also record how you accessed the item: a catalog link, collection name, physical call number, or visit date. A search result URL may be temporary, so include details that would help someone find the record through the repository. If the title or date is missing, describe that absence rather than filling it with a guess.
Describe what you used
Add a short note about the item’s type and the part you consulted. A long collection may include many folders, so identify the specific box, folder, page, or image number when possible. Note whether you used an original, scan, transcription, or catalog description. This helps readers understand what evidence informed your work and makes it easier to retrace a claim.
For example, “city directory, selected entries on page 214” is more useful than “old directory.” If you consulted only a catalog summary, say so; do not imply that you examined the underlying document. If a scanned image was hard to read, note the uncertainty and preserve any tentative transcription with a question mark.
Link sources to claims
Use a claim key or short note to connect each source to the statements it supports. One map may support a location observation, while a newspaper report supports what was publicly reported on a date. A single item rarely supports every part of a paragraph. Keeping these links visible helps you notice when an interpretation has no evidence attached or when two sources disagree.
Separate sources you consulted from sources you found mentioned elsewhere. If you have not examined a cited item, list it as a lead or reference found in another work, not as a source you personally used. This distinction protects the reliability of the bibliography and gives future researchers a clear starting point for verification.
Keep the list usable
Choose a consistent format and preserve the original spelling of titles and names. Arrange entries by archive, source type, or author, depending on what will help readers locate them. Maintain a separate search log for terms, dates, and repositories checked; a source list documents what you used, while the log documents how you looked. Together they make the project’s scope easier to understand.
Before sharing the list, check every entry for missing dates, identifiers, and access details. Test links if you have them and make sure page references match your notes. End with a brief note about the date range and kinds of materials included. A careful source list is not administrative clutter: it is the path another reader can follow to check your work and continue the research.
Spotted something we should look at? Suggest a correction.